Editorial Policies

Peer Review Process

The peer-review process of the JNSF is a double blind process.

The manuscripts submitted to the JNSF will initially be pre-screened by the Editorial Board members, and if suitable will be referred to two specialists in the relevant field. The two reviewers are experts in the matching discipline with anonymity for both author and referee.

If there is a disagreement between the reviewers, the manuscript would be sent to a third reviewer.

The final decision regarding the acceptance/rejection will be made by the Editorial Board based on the comments of the referees.

Section Policies

Editorial

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

General Articles

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Reviews

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Short Reviews

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Feature Articles

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Research Articles

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Research Communications

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Short Communications

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Research Notes

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Research News

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Opinions

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Book Reviews

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Commentaries & Notes

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Correspondence

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Conference Papers

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Welcome Statements

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Conclusions and Remarks

  • Open Submissions
  • Indexed
  • Peer Reviewed

Quick links